Predictive Modeling and Failure Forecasting For AI-Controlled Electrical Systems in Robotics and Autonomous Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the application of predictive modeling and failure forecasting techniques for enhancing the reliability and operational safety of AI-controlled electrical systems in robotics and autonomous vehicles. As these systems rely heavily on interconnected electrical components such as sensors, actuators, battery systems, and embedded controllers, even minor faults can lead to significant performance degradation or safety risks. The research employs a combination of machine learning models, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, to analyze both historical and real-time sensor data. Experimental findings demonstrate that the proposed predictive framework achieves a fault detection accuracy of 94.6%, with LSTM-based models outperforming traditional approaches by improving prediction precision by approximately 12.3% in time-series forecasting tasks. Additionally, the model successfully predicts the remaining useful life (RUL) of critical components with a mean absolute error (MAE) of less than 8.7%, enabling more effective maintenance planning. The integration of digital twin simulations further enhances system monitoring by reducing diagnostic latency by 21% and improving anomaly detection rates by 18% compared to conventional threshold-based methods. Results also indicate that implementing edge computing for on-device analytics reduces response time by nearly 35%, which is crucial for real-time decision-making in autonomous environments. Despite these advancements, challenges related to data quality, model interpretability, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities persist, requiring further research and robust system design. Overall, the study highlights that predictive modeling and failure forecasting significantly reduce unexpected system failures by up to 40% and maintenance costs by approximately 25%, demonstrating their critical role in advancing resilient, efficient, and safe AI-driven electrical systems in robotics and autonomous vehicles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".