MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161099362

Probabilistic damage and loss modeling for metal roof using artificial neural network

2007· dissertation· en· W7161099362 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Apoorv Dabral

Bibliographic record

VenueThinkTech (Texas Tech University) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoofWind engineeringWind tunnelProbabilistic logicMonte Carlo methodProbability distributionDeckTerrainArtificial neural network
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metal roofs are highly susceptible to hurricane wind damage. The damage to the roof is extremely significant in estimation of losses. Minor damage to the roof can augment the total loss because of the entrance of rain into the building, and subsequent interior and content loss. A probabilistic damage model is developed to predict the damage in a metal roof using Monte Carlo Simulation. Wind Tunnel data for five building models generated in University of Western Ontario is used to estimate the probability distribution of the extreme pressure coefficients. Wind tunnel data assist in giving more realistic loads and include significant factors such as building geometry, approach terrain and roof angle in the estimation of load. Probability distributions for the interior pressure, roll-up door failure and the resistances of the metal panels are obtained from various sources. Typical roof panels with different gages from United Steel Deck (USD) are used along with purlins of various gages and screws of different sizes to account for resistance in developing the damage model. These probability distributions are used to estimate the damage for all the wind tunnel building models. The damage dataset is then used to develop an Artificial Neural Network (ANN). This ANN is employed to estimate the damage to similar rectangular buildings where wind tunnel data is not available. The concept of a Normalized Damage Ratio (NDR) is introduced to consider variation in resistances. A large dataset of NDR’s is generated and used to develop a second ANN to address further variation in resistances. A methodology is suggested to use these ANN models to estimate losses in high wind events. Appropriate loss functions are used to estimate the losses. The damage model is also used to estimate the Average Annual Loss for a metal building in hurricane environment. Finally, a cost benefit study is performed to establish the cost effectiveness of mitigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThinkTech (Texas Tech University)Same topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207