MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161155459 · doi:10.11575/prism/51461

Building a Robust Online Teacher Education Program

2016· other· en· W7161155459 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sandra Becker, Roswita Dressler, Sarah Elaine Eaton, Dianne Gereluk

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Calgary · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeacher educationAttendanceRural areaFocus (optics)Distance educationFocus group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In rural areas, there is a high turnover of teachers, when the teachers themselves are not from the rural area. However, there are almost not opportunities for rural students to become teachers while remaining in their rural area (Alberta Education, 2013). Present teacher education programs require students to move to urban centres to do their training and practicums. Urban programs focus on teaching and learning in urban centres, often not recognizing the uniqueness of rural settings. Individual who attend urban teacher education programs rarely return to their communities to teach following the completion of their degree (Dupuy, Mayer, & Morisette, 2000). The majority of programs that target rural students require attendance at satellite campuses (Thompson & Gereluk, 2016)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of CalgaryFrench-language works237,207