MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161206855

Perencanaan Suksesi: Urgensi, Model, dan Implementasi

2018· other· id· W7161206855 on OpenAlexaff
B. (Betty) Riadini, A. (Abdul) Bari

Bibliographic record

VenueNeliti · 2018
Typeother
Languageid
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
Keywordsnot available
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Buku kategori manajemen perusahaan yang berjudul Perencanaan suksesi: urgensi, model, dan implementasi merupakan buku karya dari Betty Riadini, Abdul Bari. Buku ini membahas terkait suksesi yang dilakukan dalam suatu organisasi, baik perusahaan, pemerintah, maupun organisasi lainnya. Buku ini berisi sebelas bab pembahasan yang terbagi menjadi tiga bagian. Bagian 1 terdiri atas 2 bab: Urgensi Perencanaan Suksesi dan Peran Perencanaan Suksesi; bagian 2 terdapat 7 bab: Model Perencanaan dan Manajemen Suksesi, Pertimbangan Isu dan Kendala Perencanaan Manajemen Suksesi, Membangun Pensejajaran Strategis, Mengidentifikasi Target Suksesi dan Menganalisis Talent Pool, Pengembangan Perencanaan Suksesi, Implementasi Metode Suksesi, dan Penyesuaian Penerus/Suksesor; bagian 3: Evaluasi Strategi Suksesi dan Membangun Komitmen Pengembangan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0120.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNelitiFrench-language works237,207