Hériter et rejeter : réflexions postcritiques sur les ruptures en éducation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore les enjeux éthiques de la pédagogie postcritique à partir d’une lecture de La place (1983) d’Annie Ernaux, envisagée comme un Bildungsroman féminin contemporain. Il interroge la manière dont l’éducation peut être comprise non comme simple émancipation, mais comme transformation ambivalente, marquée par la honte, la perte et la fracture symbolique intergénérationnelle. À travers l’expérience de rupture que vit la narratrice, l’article explore la densité affective et morale des trajectoires éducatives. Il propose une lecture immanente, attentive aux silences et aux blessures, et interroge la possibilité d’une éthique éducative qui ne sacrifie pas les liens au nom de l’autonomie. Ce travail s’inscrit dans la réflexion actuelle sur les rapports entre pédagogie postcritique et éthique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.058 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".