MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161253808 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.20193206

Ornithoctona Speiser 1902

2025· article· W7161253808 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rafaela Lopes Falaschi, Edna Maria Amaral, Danilo César Ament, Carolina Ferraz Bellodi, Daniel Dias Dornelas do Carmo, Alexssandro Camargo, Antonio Marcelino do Carmo-Neto, Caio Cezar Dias Corrêa, Sávio Cunha Costa, Márcia Souto Couri, Claudio José Barros de Carvalho, Rodrigo de Vilhena Perez Dios, Maria Carolina Pimenta Dutra, Diego Aguilar Fachin, Gustavo Borges Ferro, Lívia Maria Fusari, Stephen D. Gaimar, Leonardo Henrique Gil-Azevedo, Marina Morim Gomes, Marco Silva Gottschalk, Gustavo Graciolli, Filipe Macedo Gudin, Augusto Loureiro Henriques, Gabriela Hrycyna, Tiago Kütter Krolow, Luanna L. Mendes, Ramon Luciano Mello, Cátia Antunes De Mello-Patiu, Mayara Ferreira Mendes, Gil Felipe Gonçalves Miranda, Silvio Shigueo Nihei, João Paulo Nunes de Andrade Pereira, Sarah Siqueira Oliveira, Thalles Platiny Lavinscky Pereira, Alessandre Pereira-Colavite, Lucas Quevedo Pinto, Paula Raile Riccardi

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenusIncidence (geometry)DiseaseNatural (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genus ORNITHOCTONA Speiser, 1902 Ornithoctona fusciventris (Wiedemann, 1830) (Ornithomya). Type locality: USA, Kentucky. Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil (Minas Gerais, Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo), Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Peru, USA, Venezuela. References: Bequaert (1954); Maa (1962).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorFrench-language works237,207