MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161276993 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.20189797

Hollis Jeffcoat Volume 2 Catalog (Zenodo Edition): Periodical Sources 2000–2024

2000· article· en· W7161276993 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alberto Carreras Carrasco

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt History and Market Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperDocumentationVolume (thermodynamics)PaintingNational library

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Volume 2 of the Hollis Jeffcoat Documentation Archive: a catalogue of 145 newspaper and magazine sources documenting the American painter Hollis Jeffcoat (1952–2018) from 2000 through 2024. Sources were retrieved from Newspapers.com, the Sanibel Public Library's DigiFind-It digital archive, the University of Florida Digital Newspaper Library (UFLib), Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (BAnQ), Issuu, MagCloud, La Presse+, and direct publisher websites. The volume covers regional Florida press, Naples-area periodicals, French and Quebec art and general press, and Spanish-language coverage, from the artist's mature Sanibel residency, late career, and posthumous memorial period. Each source card includes a full bibliographic block, cite flag (✅ Clean / ⚠ Incomplete), and Article use note describing the source's role in the Hollis Jeffcoat Wikipedia article and biographical research. The catalogue pairs with the Volume 2 Archive, which contains the full editorial record.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0160.023
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4320.276

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicArt History and Market AnalysisFrench-language works237,207