MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161398699 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.20245507

Blastobotrys plurivorus M. Groenew., M. T. Sm, Hern. - Restr. & Decock 2026, sp. nov.

2025· article· W7161398699 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Groenewald, M. Hernández-Restrepo, A. Zandijk, M. Smith, D. Gouliamova, C. Decock

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyphaConidiumFermentationStrain (injury)BuddingRaffinoseMyceliumLactose

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blastobotrys plurivorus M. Groenew., M.T. Sm, Hern.- Restr. & Decock, sp. nov. MB 860915. Fig. 7. Etymology: plurivorus (Lat., noun); named as strains from this species were isolated from various substrates. Typus: The Netherlands, isolated from mouse-dung, 1977, unknown collector (holotype designated here and preserved in a metabolically inactive state, CBS 137.78; ex-type strain CBS 137.78). Description: Budding cells globose, 1.5–2.5 µm diam, or ovoid, 2–4 × 2.5–5 µm. Hyphae hyaline, septate, without denticles, 1.5–2.5 µm wide. Pseudohyphae hyaline without denticles. Secondary conidia produced by primary conidia at the apex, globose 1–1.5 µm diam. Sexual reproduction has not been observed in the single strains nor in the pairwise mixtures. Culture characteristics: After 2 wk at 24 °C on GPYA the culture is snow-white, dry, dull, tough and corrugated. Physiological characteristics: Fermentation of D-glucose and D-galactose is weak (delayed) and is absent for sucrose, maltose, lactose, raffinose and trehalose. Carbon compounds assimilated are D-glucose, D-galactose, lactose © Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute 320 (weak), trehalose, maltose, cellobiose, L-sorbose, D-xylose, L-arabinose, D-ribose, glycerol, erythritol, D-mannitol, D-sorbitol, glucosamine, N -acetyl-D-glucosamine, potassium-2-keto-D-gluconate and D-glucuronate, while growth is absent on sucrose, raffinose, melibiose, melezitose, methyl-α-D-glucoside, L-rhamnose, inositol, lactic acid and D-gluconate. Growth is positive on ethylamine, L-lysine, cadaverine and D-glucosamine HCl and negative on nitrate as sole nitrogen compounds. Growth occurred at 6 °C and 30 °C and is absent at 37 °C. Growth in the presence of 0.01 % cycloheximide is positive. Additional materials examined: France, Occitanie, from a basidiome of Donkioporia expansa (Polyporales) growing on Quercus wood, Jan. 2014, C. Decock, strain CBS 17992 = MUCL 55272; Mediterranean area, from a basidiome of Fomitiporia pseudopunctata (Hymenochaetaceae), Apr. 2015, C. Decock, strain CBS 18001 = MUCL 46524. Distribution and substrates: This species is known from France (basidiome), and The Netherlands (mouse dung). According to the GlobalFungi database, samples with identical ITS sequences were obtained from samples originating from St. Helena (Peak Dale), Iran, Europe (Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, Sweden, and UK), and North America (Canada), growing on soil, deadwood, shoot, and air samples from forest, woodland, cropland and anthropogenic biomes. Notes: The three B. plurivorus strains, CBS 137.78, CBS 18001 and CBS 17992 are identical in both the ITS and LSU regions. The ex-type strain (CBS 137.78) differs from the ex-type strain (CBS 140.71) of B. farinosus with 75 nt (29 gaps) and 28 nt (five gaps) in the ITS (533 nt) and LSU (842 nt) regions respectively. Blastobotrys plurivorus and B. farinosus showed no significant physiological differences (Table 3).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→