MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161403283 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.20244480

Phaeoisaria sparsa B. Sutton, Mycol. Pap.

2025· article· W7161403283 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. (Martina) Réblová, J. Nekvindová, M. Hernández-Restrepo, M. Hradilová, M. Kolařík

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLichen and fungal ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConidiumMargin (machine learning)HyphaSporeMycelium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phaeoisaria sparsa B. Sutton, Mycol. Pap. 132: 87. 1973. Fig. 10. Description on the natural substrate: See Sutton (1973) and Hughes (1978). Culture characteristics: On CMD colonies 27–29 mm diam., circular, raised with a flat margin, margin entire, funiculose, cobwebby to mucoid towards the periphery, white-beige, margin isabelline, reverse isabelline. On MLA colonies 20–21 mm diam., circular, slightly convex, margin finely undulate, velvety, furrowed, grey, margin olivaceous grey, reverse dark olivaceous grey. On OA colonies 31–33 mm diam., circular, flat, margin entire, cobwebby to mucoid, farinose with sparse funiculose ropes of hyphae at the margin, olivaceous brown, beige towards the periphery, reverse olivaceous brown. On PCA colonies 28–30 mm diam., circular, raised with a flat margin, margin entire, velvety, funiculose at the inoculation block, white-beige, creamy at the margin, reverse pale brown. Sporulation was abundant on CMD, MLA and PCA, moderate on OA. Description in culture: Colonies on CMD effuse. Mycelium composed of hyaline, subhyaline to brown, septate hyphae, 1.5–2.5 μm wide. Synnemata absent. Conidiophores macronematous, semi-macronematous or reduced to a single conidiogenous cell. Conidiogenous cells 5–18 × 2–3.5 µm, integrated, terminal and intercalary, polyblastic, sympodially extending, oval, cylindrical to subulate, hyaline, smooth, with several denticles, 1.5 × 0.5 µm; conidiogenesis holoblastic-denticulate. Conidia solitary, dry, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, with one or two large guttules, with a truncate basal scar, secession schizolytic, of two types (formed on all media): 5.5–8 × 2–2.5 µm (mean ± SD = 7.2 ± 0.7 × 2.2 ± 0.2 μm), on MLA 4.5–7.5 × 2–3 µm (mean ± SD = 6.1 ± 0.8 × 2.6 ± 0.3 μm), oblong to elongate clavate, straight or slightly curved, rounded at the apex, hyaline, aseptate; 3–3.5 × 1.5–2 µm (mean ± SD = 3.4 ± 0.3 × 1.7 ± 0.2 μm), on MLA 3.5–4.5 × 1.5–3 µm (mean ± SD = 3.8 ± 0.4 × 2.2 ± 0.4 μm), guttuliform to dacryoid; sporulation associated with the aerial part of the colony. Sexual morph not observed. Material examined: Spain, Aragón, Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park, Torla, on dead twig, 23 Mar. 2011, M. Hernández-Restrepo & J. Gené, culture FMR 11939. Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe, originally described from decaying bark of Acer spicatum, with additional reports from decaying wood of various deciduous trees, e.g. Alnus sp., Betula papyrifera, Corylus sp., Populus tremuloides, Populus balsamifera, Salix sp. in Canada, New Zealand, and Spain (Sutton 1973, MyCoPortal, this study). According to GlobalFungi database, this species was the second most abundant within the genus, detected in 66 samples. Most records originated from forests and woodlands (83 %), followed by anthropogenic habitats (10 %), croplands (5.7 %), and to a lesser extent, grasslands and desert biomes (1.3 %). The majority of samples were soil-related (66 %), with additional occurrences from dead organic matter (17 %), air (9 %), and roots or shoots (7 %). The samples predominantly originated from temperate zones across three continents: North America (USA), Europe (Czech Republic, Belgium, Germany, Latvia, Estonia, Italy, Spain, Sweden), and East Asia (China, South Korea). Two exceptions included records from Mediterranean climates (Seville, Spain) and a single occurrence in the Antarctic polar zone. Notes: In our phylogenetic analyses, P. sparsa is represented by strain FMR 11939, isolated from a dead twig in Spain (Hernández-Restrepo et al. 2017). Our material corresponds well with the protologue (Sutton 1973) based on observations on natural substrate: synnemata 220–250 × 17–28 µm, conidiogenous cells 15–20.5 × 3–3.5 µm with denticles 1.5–2 × 0.5 µm, and conidia 12–17 × 2.5–3.5 µm. It is well defined by its 0–3-septate, fusiform to oblong-clavate conidia and subulate conidiogenous cells, which are mostly confined to the apices of the synnemata, giving them a somewhat penicillate appearance. In culture, the synnemata were absent and the fungus produced two types of conidia differing in shape and size (oblong to elongate clavate and guttuliform to dacryoid), a feature also observed in P. parallela. In culture, the conidia were consistently aseptate. Furthermore, in culture, the size and shape of both conidial types were comparable across all media, although on MLA, the oblong to elongate conidia were slightly shorter, while the guttuliform to dacryoid conidia were slightly longer (see description). The longer conidia, although comparable in shape to those on the natural substrate, were shorter in culture (5.5–8 × 2–2.5 µm on CMD, 4.5–7.5 × 2–3 µm on MLA). Phaeoisaria sparsa is similar to P. parallela in conidial characteristics; however, both species are morphologically well differentiated. As only ITS and LSU sequences of the strain FMR 11939 were available in GenBank, we generated sequences from other gene regions to complete its molecular dataset. The combined morphological and molecular differences support the recognition of P. parallela and P. sparsa as distinct species. For a detailed morphological comparison of both species, see the notes under the description of P. parallela.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.055

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicLichen and fungal ecology→French-language works237,207→