MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161684332 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.20288278

Figs 59–62. 59. Herpetogramma thestealis female PYR 762 in A revision of the Canadian species of the Genus Herpetogramma Lederer, 1863 (Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Spilomelinae: Herpetogrammatini), with descriptions of three new species

2021· other· W7161684332 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Louis Handfield, Daniel Handfield Introduction

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2021
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenusTaxonomy (biology)BiogeographyTaxonomic key

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Figs 59–62. 59. Herpetogramma thestealis female PYR 762: Canada, BC, Vancouver, Stanley Park, 49.063° N, 123.1528° W, 24.vii.2007, A. Li. 60. Herpetogramma nymphalis sp. n. female PYR 1302: Canada, QC, Gatineau, Gatineau Park, Mont King, 24.v.1989, B. Landry. 61. Herpetogramma aeglealis female PYR 546: Canada, QC, Mont-St-Hilaire, 45°31.758' N, 73°10.723' W, 5.vii.2008, Louis Handfield. 62. Herpetogramma sphingealis female PYR 550: Canada, QC, Otterburn Park, Les Bosquets Hudon, 5.viii.2006, Louis Handfield.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1570.055

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→