MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161715256 · doi:10.59236/emro.v27i3a8419

Jack and Sam

2025· article· W7161715256 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kelsey Robertson

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFilm in Education and Therapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)The HolocaustSubject (documents)Subject matterAsideGerman

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed by Grasshopper Film, 12 East 32nd St., 4th Floor, New York, NY 10016Produced by Andrew Carlberg, Jordan Matthew Horowitz, Julianna Margulies, Sarah Silverman, Amy Zvi, Jennifer Morrison, Gerardo Celasco, and Harlan WaksalDirected by Jordan Matthew Horowitz2023, Streaming, 20 mins A touching story of the power of friendship, hope, and determination is exemplified by two long lost friends who found each other during the impossible. The film Jack and Sam tells the story of Jack Waksal and Sam Ron, who met in the most brutal of circumstances and found each other again almost 80 years later. We hear from both men about their experiences as Holocaust survivors brought to life by archival footage, photos, and animation. The film begins with archival footage as we hear Jack and Sam discuss what life was like in their Polish hometowns before and after the Germans arrived during World War II. A fun childhood was immediately turned on its head for both men as they were forced into ghettos and labor camps where they worked to live. Everyday scenes encountered by the two men during their captivity are described and supported by archival footage of ghettos, camps, and forced labor. This film does not shy away from the difficult images produced by such atrocities. Though the subject matter is heavy, the quality of the footage is quite clear, considering its age. If there was a digitization and remastering project performed, it seems to have been done well. This aspect leads to a more visceral reaction while digesting the images and listening to the subjects’ narratives. The inclusion of this footage is also important in displaying the devastation and inhumanity that our subjects, and many others, were forced to endure. A description of forced transportation in cattle cars is represented by artistic greyscale animation that looks as if the scenes are sketches; you can see pencil marks and cross-hatching on the individuals. This artistic choice also gives the people a haggard, down-beaten quality, which in reality is probably what they were. Other scenes are also depicted by animation which can help keep the audience’s attention, especially that of students. Additionally, this choice of representation also allows a bit of relief from the harsh archival footage but still appropriately translates the truth of the situation. The film does an excellent job of seamlessly integrating the animation with the interviews of Jack and Sam and the archival footage. The Pionki camp is where Jack and Sam worked together for eight or nine months until Jack escaped into the forest. Sam stayed behind in the camp but was liberated in May 1945, while Jack spent over six months hiding in the forest until the Russians arrived. Their unbelievable reunion took place at an event by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum almost 80 years later. In whatever time the two have left, they are determined to continue to thrive and enjoy their renewed friendship. It can be considered a miracle that these two individuals could endure such inhumane circumstances at the hands of fellow human beings yet proclaim that hate has no place in the world. This is part of their message when they speak to school students about their story. Their urgency to continue to talk about their experiences in an effort to ensure their stories, like that of so many others, stay alive is inspiring. However, not every survivor of the Holocaust has been able to be so open about their experiences. This film can be an important learning tool to portray how some survivors are able to use the time they have left. Jack and Sam never stopped dreaming, and their story is a true reminder of what the human spirit is capable of, even in the darkest of times. I do wish their story was portrayed in a longer format that slowed the content down, so viewers could get to know their family and childhood in more detail for added context. Learning about their childhood in more detail before the Germans arrived in their towns and during their occupation could have added a more intimate quality to the film, allowing the audience to form a deeper connection with the subjects. Despite the short run time, I highly recommend this film for upper-level high school through college. Additionally, the short run time could be beneficial for a high school class format considering their limited time compared to that of college courses. This documentary is in English with English subtitles. Awards:Winner, Best Documentary Short, Phoenix Film Festival; Winner, Best Documentary Short Film, Sulmona International Film Festival; Winner, Audience Award - Best Doc Short, Calgary International Film Festival; Winner, Best American Indie Short, Fort Lauderdale International Film Festival; Winner, Best Documentary Short Film, Port Townsend Film Festival

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.509
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducational Media Reviews OnlineSame topicFilm in Education and TherapyFrench-language works237,207