MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161733935 · doi:10.3138/cjfms-2025-0020

Water, Power: Hydro-Imaginaries and the Churchill Falls Project in Crawley Films

2025· article· en· W7161733935 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rachel Webb Jekanowski

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film and Media Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Governance and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydroelectricityPerpetuityModernization theoryPower (physics)Hydro powerFoundation (evidence)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large-scale hydroelectric developments have been closely tied to both state-sponsored modernization agendas and nation-building since the twentieth century. This article examines the production of “hydro-imaginaries” about hydroelectricity in Power in Perpetuity: The Churchill Falls Project (Sally MacDonald, 1967), produced by Crawley Films for the Churchill Falls Labrador Corporation. Power in Perpetuity is one of three Crawley productions documenting the construction of the Churchill Falls Hydroelectric Station in central Labrador, Canada between 1967 and 1972. Using film analysis and archival research on the film’s production and circulation, I examine how Power in Perpetuity represents cheap, abundant hydroelectricity as a provincial and national resource, a foundation for modern life, and a fuel for sustaining southern, settler futures. By analyzing cinematic representations of Churchill Falls, this article contributes to scholarly examinations of the Crawley Films archive, filmic representations of the environmental injustices of modernization, and visual histories of energy in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0160.015
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film and Media StudiesSame topicWater Governance and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207