MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161755271 · doi:10.82308/45222

Archean mafic volcanism of the Eastern Ungava peninsula, Northern Quebec

2001· dissertation· en· W7161755271 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charles Maurice

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcheanMaficPrecambrianBasaltGreenstone beltVolcanic rockVolcanoMantle (geology)Flood basalt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mafic volcanic sequences of tholeiitic basalt and associated komatiite are common to many Precambrian shields of the world. Recently discovered remnants of Archean greenstone belts in the northern Superior Province of Canada exhibit characteristics similar to larger belts of the southern Superior Province. Three of the best preserved belts are trapped in ca. 2.77--2.88 Ga tonalitic intrusives of the Faribault-Thury amphibolitic Complex (FTC), and provide direct evidence for the nature of the mantle prior to the major volcanic events of the late Archean (ca. 2.7 Ga). These belts consist of amphibolite facies rocks of volcanic and sedimentary origin, in one of which a wide variety of cumulates are preserved. The association of the lavas with meta-pelites, iron formations, marbles, and the lack of conglomerate and clearly crustally contaminated lavas suggest that the FTC lavas were erupted in an oceanic environment. The three belts are separated by over 100 km, but exhibit similar chemical characteristics and may represent the base of an extensive early mafic crust. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→