MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161759189 · doi:10.82308/41417

"Temple of my Heart": Understanding religious space in Montreal's Hindu Bangladeshi Community

2017· dissertation· en· W7161759189 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aditya Bhattacharjee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHinduismDharmaGender relationsSpace (punctuation)EvangelismRelation (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cette thèse, je présente un aperçu de la communauté hindoue bangladaise de Montréal, au Québec, et surtout sa relation avec l'espace religieux communautaire. La thèse s'appuie sur le rôle du temple Sanatan Dharma de Montréal (MSDT), inauguré officiellement en 2014, en tant que point focal communautaire pour les Bangladeshis hindous de Montréal. J'avance que le fait que la communauté soit propriétaire de l'espace du temple est profondément lié à sa mission de préserver ce que ses dirigeants qualifient d'«authenticité culturelle», tout en permettant à cette communauté émergente de s'intégrer de manière novatrice au Canada. Je documente comment l'acquisition de l'espace communautaire à Montréal est apparue comme une stratégie primordiale pour implanter de façon renouvelée la culture bangladaise hindoue au Canada. Paradoxalement, la création d'un temple hindou bangladais distinct et les rites «traditionnels» qui y sont pratiqués favorisent l'intégration et l'appartenance des Hindous Bangladeshis au Canada. La relation entre les migrants hindous-bangladais et l'espace religieux communautaire offre un aperçu utile d'une vision contemporaine de l'authenticité hindoue dans un contexte transnational.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBangladesh Politics, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207