MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161773188 · doi:10.82308/15194

Design for manufacturability of a composite helicopter structure made by resin transfer moulding

2008· dissertation· en· W7161773188 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julian O'Flynn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEpoxy Resin Curing Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesign for manufacturabilityComposite numberManufacturing costQuality (philosophy)Injection mouldingWork (physics)Production (economics)Transfer molding

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resin transfer moulding (RTM) is a promising composite manufacturing method capable of producing high quality parts while meeting the rising demand for cost effectiveness. A collaborative research project involving academia, industry, and government in the Montreal area is under way to optimize RTM and help transfer this technology to local industries. As a technology demonstrator, the leading edge slat of the Bell 407 helicopter is being redesigned using composite materials and RTM. This thesis presents the mould design, part design for manufacturability, and actual production of half-length prototype parts. The mould and part designs were carried out concurrently taking into consideration results from stress analysis and flow modelling, as well as manufacturing constraints. A total of eight prototypes were manufactured. During the development of this project, important improvements were made in the way composite parts are manufactured by RTM. The lessons learned from this prototype design and manufacturing work will help to produce the full-size version of the slat as well as other components in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEpoxy Resin Curing ProcessesFrench-language works237,207