Students' conceptions of learning and their correspondence to learning in western universities: a study of Chinese graduate students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This mixed-methods study explored Chinese graduate students' conceptions of learning, and the correspondence between conceptions of learning, and their learning experiences in universities in the United Kingdom (UK) and Canada. In particular, this study shows how the conceptions of learning developed in a Chinese educational context correspond to the challenges of their graduate study in western universities inside and outside the classroom, and to the strategies they used to deal with those challenges. A survey of conceptions of learning was administered to 107 mainland Chinese students who had completed their undergraduate studies in mainland China by using the revised Conceptions of Learning Inventory (COLI) (Purdie & Hattie, 2002). Among them, 44 had only studied in universities in China and 63 were either currently studying or had recently concluded their graduate studies in the UK or Canada. A purposeful sample of 20 graduate students, ten from the UK and ten from Canada, was obtained from the previously sampled pool of 63 people who were studying or had completed graduate studies in western settings for an in-depth interview. A MANOVA was performed to test the differences in conceptions of learning between those who did and those who did not study at a western university, based on the subscales of the COLI. No significant differences were detected between the two groups on any of the subscales except learning as the development of the social competency subscale. The interview results identified ten categories of conceptions of learning, and all participants held multiple conceptions of learning rather than just a single conception. The challenges and adjustment strategies that Chinese students have while studying at a western university are associated with how they view learning. The variations in the challenges that Chinese students encounter during their study in western universities are associa
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".