MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161796757 · doi:10.82308/44730

Revegetation and reclamation of oil sands process-affected material using «Frankia»-inocculated alders: field and greenhouse trials

2009· dissertation· en· W7161796757 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elisabeth Lefrançois

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevegetationOil sandsTailingsLand reclamationFrankiaBiomass (ecology)Microbial population biologyBioenergy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada's oil sand industry produces substantial quantities of oil sands process-affected material (OSPM) including composite tailings (CT) and tailings sands (TS) that need to be reclaimed on site. This work evaluated the establishment of a pioneer plant species, alder, inoculated with a nitrogen-fixing actinomycete, Frankia. The main objectives were to evaluate alder performance in OSPM and its impact on soil characteristics and microbial community structure and function. This project was divided into two phases: a field study and a greenhouse trial. The greenhouse trial tested 2 alder species, Alnus glutinosa and A. crispa, in CT and TS. In addition to Frankia inoculation, a tripartite association with a mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus intraradices was evaluated. The field study consisted of a 2 year monitoring of Frankia-inoculated alders (A. crispa (Ait.) Pursh.) planted in TS capped with overburden material and peat moss. The parameters tested were the following: plant biomass and nitrogen content; soil chemical characteristics; microbial biomass; microbial petroleum hydrocarbon mineralization capability; and microbial community diversity and composition using the molecular techniques, PCR and DGGE. Alders performed well in OSPM and Frankia inoculation improved biomass acquisition. Frankia-alders improved a number of soil quality parameters such as pH, sodium content, and CEC. Frankia-alders presence modified soil microbial activity and diversity. Alder rhizosphere sustained more microbial biomass than unplanted soil, whereas the tripartite association did not provide additional benefits. Overall, Frankia-inoculated alders are an interesting biotechnological approach for the reclamation and revegetation of oil sand process-affected materials. Abbreviation: PCR (polymerase chain reaction), DGGE (Denaturating Gradient Gel Electrophoresis), CEC (Cation Exchange Capacity), TS (Tailings Sands), CT (Composite

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants→French-language works237,207→