MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161809453 · doi:10.82308/33313

Investigating genetic aberrations in metastatic gastric cancer and in primary renal cell carcinoma

2016· dissertation· en· W7161809453 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nazanin Nourbehesht

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancerRenal cell carcinomaMetastasisGeneSomatic cellMutationKidney cancerGermline mutationPrimary tumor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has substantially contributed to our understanding of underlying factors of different cancers. In the first chapter of this thesis, I used NGS (whole-exome sequencing (WES)) to investigate genetic abnormalities associated with metastatic gastric cancer. In the second chapter of this thesis, I used NGS data (targeted sequencing) to investigate association between mutational status of PBRM1 (the second most commonly mutated gene in renal cancer) and clinical variables of affected patients. I have also extended my work to analyze function of PBRM1 in an in vitro model of renal cancer.Chapter-1: Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer related death worldwide accounting for over 2000 deaths/year in Canada. Peritoneal metastasis is the most common site of gastric cancer progression after curative intent surgery and is the leading cause of death. Metastasis to this site represents a significant challenge in patient management and there is limited knowledge about the underlying factors. We have performed WES of patient-matched trio samples including normal DNA, primary gastric cancer, and peritoneal metastasis from five unrelated patients in order to identify somatic mutations associated with the metastasis. We found several genes recurrently mutated in these tumors including known cancer-related genes such as KRAS, TP53 and CDH1. Moreover, our analysis revealed additional potentially interesting genes including DSG1, SPTA1 and HMCN1. Our findings highlight a heterogeneous mutational pattern in gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis, and provide the first catalogue of somatic mutations in this entity.Chapter-2: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most prevalent type of renal cell carcinoma. PBRM1 (polybromo-1) is the second most commonly mutated gene affected in about 40% of ccRCC cases after VHL (Von Hippel-Lindau, mutated in about 70% of patients). Molecular mechanisms by which deficiency of PBRM1 contribute to ccRCC are not fully understood despite the high prevalence of PBRM1 mutations in ccRCC. Our lab has previously shown that tumors with mutated PBRM1 harbor larger number of somatic mutations compared to those without PBRM1 mutations. We have also shown that tumors exhibiting a mutational signature compatible to the exposure of Aristolochic Acid (AA) (which induces A>T mutations) showed higher rate of truncating mutations in PBRM1. However, these PBRM1 mutations were not due to AA exposure. These findings suggest that PBRM1 deficiency may at least partly contribute to the dysregulation of response to DNA damage and apoptosis. I examined this hypothesis in 786-O cell line model of ccRCC by analyzing cell proliferation and apoptosis following modulation of PBRM1 expression in combination with treatment with AA. Our results indicate that PBRM1 deficiency impairs induction of AA-related apoptosis in 786-O cell line. This suggests that PBRM1 may be involved in response to environmental stress such as toxic agents including DNA-damage inducers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→