MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161811280 · doi:10.82308/27062

Development and evaluation of RZWQM2-P: A model for phosphorus management in tile-drained agricultural fields

2021· dissertation· en· W7161811280 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Debasis Sadhukhan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTile drainageSurface runoffAgricultureManureDrainageWater qualityHydrology (agriculture)Manure managementSurface water

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A rising environmental concern, phosphorus (P) loss from agricultural fields via surface runoff or sub-surface drainage ends up in freshwater bodies (river, lakes), where it causes widespread algal blooms and water quality degradation. Recent studies suggest that agricultural fields fitted with artificial tile drainage system contribute heavily to these P losses. Simulation models could help to measure and manage the agricultural P losses and inform prudent management decisions to mitigate this problem in a time saving and cost-effective way. Computer simulation models for this purpose are presently lacking, particularly for tile drained agricultural fields. Accordingly, the present study was undertaken to develop a computer simulation model to simulate P loss from a tile drained agricultural field through different hydrological pathways. A state-of-the-art algorithm to simulate the fate and transport of P in tile-drained agricultural systems is proposed, tested and incorporated into the RZWQM2 model, to take advantage of its hydrologic and agricultural management subroutines — thereby yielding the RZWQM2-P model. Structured according to Jones et al., (1984) with updates and modifications prescribed by Vadas, (2014), the RZWQM2-P model features dedicated manure and fertilizer P pools to simulate P dynamics arising from their application. To simulate daily P absorption/desorption among the P pools, a dynamically changing rate factor is applied rather than a constant rate factor. Tile drainage dissolved reactive P (DRP) and particulate bound P (PP) loss are estimated according to Francesconi et al., (2016) and Jarvis et al., (1999), respectively. Losses of DRP and PP through surface runoff are simulated according to Neitsch et al., (2011) and McElroy et al., (1976), respectively. The RZWQM2-P model’s capacity to simulate the DRP and PP loss from an agricultural field through surface runoff and tile drainage was evaluated using two sets of observed P loss and water flow data collected from subsurface-drained fields under a corn-soybean rotation on a clay loam soil in southwestern Ontario, Canada. For both cases, the RZWQM2-P model performed satisfactorily (NSE > 0.50, PBAIS within ±30%, IoA >0.75). A sensitivity analysis of the RZWQM2-P’s input parameters was conducted to facilitate the application of the model by users like agricultural managers and environmental stakeholders. The sensitivity analysis found the simulation of RZWQM2-P’s P loss depends on many parameters; however, macroporosity was the preeminent parameter in simulation of all form of P losses. The DRP loss through surface runoff was most sensitive to the P extraction coefficient, and PP loss through surface runoff was mainly governed by the parameters of the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Tile flow DRP and PP losses were most sensitive to the plant P uptake distribution parameter and the soil detachability coefficient. The newly developed RZWQM2-P model is a capable tool for the simulation of P losses from an agricultural field, particularly for the tile-drained fields, however, it requires skilled and computationally demanding modelling

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics→French-language works237,207→