MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161813097 · doi:10.82308/34487

La poétique de la non-rencontre chez Louis Gauthier suivi de Sakrubaï et les autres

2010· dissertation· fr· W7161813097 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Veronique Pion

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCaribbean and African Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrilogyImpossibilityRelation (database)NarrativePoetryAccident (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a first "critical"part, the present thesis offers an analysis of the poetic of non-meeting in the novelist of Quebec, Louis Gauthier. It will be a question here of exploring the trilogy of this writer dedicated to the travel narratives by trying to show that certain predispositions reduce the chances of the protagonist to live the experience of meeting. We shall be interested in impossibility for the narrator, at the same time traveller and writer, to establish a dialogue, to find words to get into contact with those that crosses his road. These features will allow us then to see how the trilogy will act as warning for our own writing. The second and last part "creation" will especially be constituted of short stories around the topic of meeting. Those short stories, composed in most cases of travel narratives, answer and tend to form a timeless collection where the relation with Others is essential and omnipresent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaribbean and African Literature and Culture→French-language works237,207→