MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161815875 · doi:10.82308/43862

Reconstructing the depositional history of the terminal Mesoproterozoic Bylot basins of northeastern Laurentia

2023· dissertation· en· W7161815875 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Greenman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaurentiaSedimentary depositional environmentGeochronologyRadiometric datingGeologic recordDeposition (geology)VarvePalaeogeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Bylot basins, comprising the Borden (BB), Fury and Hecla (FHB), Thule (TB) and Aston-Hunting (AHB) basins record the evolution of present-day northeastern Canada and northwestern Greenland between ca. 1.3-1.0 Ga. The BB and AHB host the only known fossils of Bangiomorpha pubescens, a red alga that represents the oldest taxonomically resolved eukaryote discovered to date. Geochemical studies suggest that the BB was intermittently open to the ocean and restricted, potentially even lacustrine, highlighting the potential significance of freshwater environments for eukaryotic evolution. Recent radiometric dates anchor these findings in the geologic record and demonstrate that most sediment accumulation in these basins occurred hundreds of millions of years later than originally assumed ca. 1050 Ma. Deposition in the Bylot basins therefore overlaps with phases of the Grenville Orogeny, as supported by 87Sr/86Sr, which capture the effect of weathering of the Grenville Province. These data and interpretations are based mainly on studies in the BB, which has received the most attention out of the Bylot basins. In stark contrast, the FHB to the south, and the TB to the northeast, have received comparatively little attention, as the former is not as well exposed. As important interpretations emerge from work in the BB, ideas must be tested through renewed investigations in the other Bylot basins which are presumed to be geodynamically linked with the BB and provide greater regional context. This thesis strives to shed light on the FHB and TB through new mapping, stratigraphic logging, geochronology and paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Mapping campaigns to the FHB and TB update geologic maps and improve stratigraphic frameworks to strengthen correlations with strata of the BB. The age of the Fury and Hecla Group was assumed to be ca. 1.27 Ga based on the affinity of basal basalts to the Mackenzie Large Igneous Province, but this inference lacked geochronological evidence. We have generated the first depositional age constraint for the Fury and Hecla Group, a rhenium-osmium age of 1087 ± 6 Ma on black shales of the Agu Bay Formation. This age confirms that, like the BB, strata of the FHB were predominantly deposited after 1100 Ma, which implies a large depositional hiatus in the lower part of the stratigraphy. Whereas extension during the late Mesoproterozoic is often thought to have been isolated to the midcontinent, our results indicate that Mesoproterozoic extension in Laurentia was far more extensive than previously thought. Extension generated numerous cratonic basins on Laurentia, which host important microfossils key to understanding the early evolution of eukaryotes. To investigate the importance of these non-marine ecosystems for eukaryotic evolution, we test the B/Ga and Sr/Ga paleosalinity proxies on Proterozoic strata for the first time. We begin with the Arctic Bay Formation, which is thought to have been deposited in a restricted setting, and demonstrate that the B/Ga proxy reasonably predicts paleosalinity. We extend this to the FHB and TB where it indicates that deposition of shale rich successions predominantly occurred in brackish to lacustrine settings. Last, to better understand the co-evolution of the individual Bylot basins, we present the first unified tectonostratigraphic framework for the region, which identifies three broad phases of deposition that can be related to well-understood tectonic stresses on Laurentia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→