MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161830443 · doi:10.82308/11549

Refugee Mothers’ Experiences of Emotion Work and Coping: An Intersectional Framework

2025· dissertation· en· W7161830443 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kim Abi Zeid Daou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeMental healthPsychological interventionThematic analysisAsylum seekerIntersectionalityCitizenshipDisplaced person

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Approximately 70,000 Syrian refugees were resettled in Canada by 2021 (Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada, 2022). Syrian refugee families in Canada struggle with sociocultural adaptation (Oudshoorn et al., 2020; Stewart et al., 2019). The first study in this dissertation explores the challenges in adaptation Syrian refugee families face in Montréal, Québec. Through a thematic analysis, the themes “Educational challenges” in terms of communication barriers and racism, “Adult adaptation”, and “Emotional exhaustion” emerged from the semi-structured interviews. Eight refugee mothers, between 30 and 36 years old, participated. They shared their experiences vis-à-vis their additional emotion work in the household, their emotional exhaustion, and their desire for more resources and interventions focused on them. This was a driving force for the theoretical foundation of this dissertation. The dissertation’s overarching aim is to explore the specific and intersectional lived experiences of refugee mothers. Future directions were conducting a systematic review of interventions for refugee mothers and their mental health and social support needs as well as exploring refugee mothers’ experiences vis-a-vis their emotion work and coping. Refugee mothers endure and are at risk for mental health challenges, such as post-traumatic stress, suicidality, and depression (Rahman & Hafeez, 2003; Schweitzer et al., 2018). Interventions including refugee mothers rarely provide adequate and contextualized support for refugee mothers’ specific mental health needs and challenges, and there is a gap in the literature regarding refugee mothers’ specific needs and appropriate mental health interventions (Dybdahl, 2001; Jesuthasan et al., 2019; Milkie et al., 2020). The second study presents empirical evidence to contextualize the risks refugee mothers face, such as gender-based violence, mental health challenges, and language barriers. Then, the paper provides a critical systematic review of six interventions conducted with refugee mothers. Although there were some interventions that incorporated refugee mothers’ needs, they either did not calculate and assess outcomes, or the interventions’ methodology did not properly align with their outlined objectives. The review suggests that across different populations and methodologies a pattern emerged whereby contact with others with similar experience and culture was essential, having allies increased refugees’ willingness to connect more to the host country society, and the refugee mothers benefited from having a safe space to discuss their shared experiences (Abi Zeid Daou, 2022; Koh et al., 2018; O’Shaughnessy et al., 2012; White et al., 2009).The third study explores how Syrian refugee mothers’ adaptation in Montréal was affected by the experiences of emotion work and coping. The same participants were included. The study provides an expansion of the emotion work framework to include refugee mothers of color, their positionality and lived experience, and their qualitative experience of emotion work vis-à-vis resettlement. The themes that emerged from the thematic analysis of the semi-structured interviews were emotion work as “hiding negative affect”, “maneuvering new homes”, “overcompensating”, and “language stressors”. Religion and praying were found to be a coping mechanism for Syrian refugee mothers. The final paper also included implications and recommendations for therapy. Through an understanding of the expansion of the emotion work framework to include refugee mothers of color, their positionality and lived experience, and their qualitative experience of emotion work vis-à-vis resettlement, mental health professionals must develop with their clients a deep understanding of the complex systems within the post-resettlement context. Specific attention should be given to the loss of community, to additional emotion work, self-concealment, and other forms of maladaptive coping

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.012
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.012
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMigration, Health and Trauma→French-language works237,207→