Relationships between psychosocial functioning of the child, parental coping and pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis is poorly understood. Although there is a link between pain and disease activity, pain is also modulated by other factors. The psychosocial functioning of the child is linked to his/her pain experience, however direction of causality is unknown. Furthermore, the potential association between parental coping and children's pain has never been explored. The objectives were to evaluate relationships between psychosocial functioning of the child, parental coping, and concurrent pain and future pain report at 6 months. The database "Determinants of outcomes for juvenile arthritis" from the Montreal Children's Hospital, including 95 patients, was used. Hierarchical multiple linear regression was performed. Psychosocial functioning of the child was identified as a correlate of pain, above and beyond disease activity, in the cross-sectional analysis. However, it did not predict future pain. Use of the parental coping pattern "social support" was associated with less concurrent pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".