MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161835033 · doi:10.82308/51095

The impact of cumulative partial sleep deprivation on simulated driving and cognitive functions: a randomized, controlled trial

2019· dissertation· en· W7161835033 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jose Santisteban Lopez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep deprivationActigraphyEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceSleep (system call)PlaceboSleep debtCognitionChronotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep deprivation increases the odds of being involved in a road traffic accident. An estimated 23% of adults in Canada sleep at least one hour less than what they consider optimal during the work week. However, the impact of cumulative partial sleep deprivation of one hour per night for six nights on driving performance has not been studied. The present dissertation set to determine 1) the impact of cumulative partial sleep deprivation versus a placebo condition on driving performance; 2) if changes in sustained attention, working memory, response inhibition, and decision-making following sleep deprivation mediate the effect of cumulative partial sleep deprivation on driving performance; and 3) the extent to which age, sex, and chronotype moderate this impact. The samples included healthy participants (ages 18-25 and 30-34) who were randomly allocated to undergo either one-hour nightly sleep restriction or a placebo control condition. Sleep measures, cognitive performance, and driving simulator performance were measured at baseline and following experimental manipulation. The findings, presented in a series of three manuscript, are the following: 1) cumulative partial sleep deprivation did not impair driving performance; 2) cumulative partial sleep deprivation negatively affects performance on a test of working memory capacity, but does not affect performance on tests of sustained attention, response inhibition, or decision making; 3) impairment in working memory following cumulative partial sleep deprivation did not lead to an increase in lateral position variability; 4) corrected midpoints of sleep on free days (a measure of chronotype) derived from the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire and from actigraphy are on average the same; and 5) chronotype, sex, or age did not moderate the findings on cumulative partial sleep deprivation and lateral position variability and driving speed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSleep and Work-Related FatigueFrench-language works237,207