MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Indirect MPC with Adaptive DC-Link Voltage Control for a CHB-based Shunt Active Power Filter

2025· article· W7161837058 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Curtis, Joseph Fourcaudot, Saige Niemi, Darian Smith, Apparao Dekka, Deepak Ronanki

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)VoltageAC powerActive filterAdaptive controlShunt (medical)Model predictive control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fixed dc-link voltage operation of a shunt active power filter (SAPF) produces high current ripple and affects its ability to compensate the grid harmonic currents under light loading conditions (i.e., operating at low modulation indices). In this paper, an indirect model predictive control (MPC) is proposed for a cascaded H-bridge (CHB) based SAPF to compensate the grid harmonic currents. In addition, an adaptive dc-link voltage control philosophy is proposed to adjust the net dc-link voltage depending on the harmonic current magnitude. Through the proposed method, CHB-based SAPF always operates at higher modulation indices, resulting in an improved performance and produces less current ripple, irrespective of the harmonic current magnitude. Also, the redundancy switching state selection algorithm is developed to equally distribute the net dc-link voltage between each H-bridge module in a CHB. Simulation studies are presented to study the performance of the proposed indirect MPC with adaptive dc-link voltage control philosophy for a CHB-based SAPF with current and voltage source type harmonic loads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC Converters→French-language works237,207→