Genetic analysis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other motor neuron disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating motor neuron disease which results from the degeneration of upper and lower motor neurons in the brainstem, spinal cord and motor cortex. Tragically there is no treatment to prevent ALS. The drug Riluzole acts to delay progression, but only by a month or so in this disease that has a survival length of three to five years. The identification of genes that are mutated in patients with ALS would help devise novel therapeutic strategies as much remains to be discovered about the genetics of ALS. Familial forms of the disease account for only 5-10% of patients. Among these familial cases, about 15-20% are caused by mutations in the zinc/copper superoxide dismutase gene, but the genetic basis of the remaining familial cases and the many sporadic cases continues to be largely unknown. Altogether, the results presented in this thesis came from the use of several strategies to establish the genetic cause of ALS and the related motor neuron disorders like hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) and primary lateral sclerosis (PLS). A concerted and collaborative effort was put forth to identify the gene causative for ALS3 on chromosome 18. In addition, a recently reported locus has been confirmed on chromosome 9p for patients that present both ALS and frontotemporal dementia. The major finding involves the discovery of eight mutations in the TARDBP gene in nine patients with sporadic and familial ALS. Furthermore, a large association study evaluated the role of common polymorphisms in the paraoxonase gene cluster in susceptibility to the development of ALS. In the analysis of upper motor neuron diseases, mutations in a novel gene, KIAA0196, were identified for the HSP locus SPG8 on chromosome 8. Finally, the first locus for PLS was discovered on the p-arm of chromosome 4 following genome scan analysis of a large Quebec family with PLS. These genetic discoveries all contributed novel advances to the field of motor neuron disorders. As more is elucidated regarding the biochemical function of these the proteins encoded by these genes, a more comprehensive picture of ALS and other motor neuron disorders will hopefully emerge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".