"Doing it for the family": educational experiences of first-generation female Filipino teens in public schools in Montreal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La présente étude qualitative décrit les expériences de cinq étudiantes philippines dans le système scolaire public montréalais. Mon objectif est de comprendre pourquoi certaines étudiantes philippines quittent l'école avant d'obtenir leur diplôme alors que d'autres parviennent à persévérer et compléter leurs études. Une série d'entrevues ouvertes en anglais et en tagal a été effectuée afin d'examiner les expériences scolaires de chaque femme. Les participantes ont décrit leurs difficultés d'adaptation au système scolaire québécois et comment leurs amis les ont influencées à laisser tomber leurs études. Elles ont aussi raconté comment le stress économique peut pousser des jeunes philippines à abandonner leurs études afin de travailler. Mon analyse est principalement basée sur le concept du capital par Pierre Bourdieu (1986). Les résultats indiquent également l'importante contribution amenée par des relations familiales positives et par des éducateurs compréhensifs à l'encouragement des étudiantes philippines à terminer leurs études.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".