Bibliographic record
Abstract
The never-ending changes in the mineral industry environment require fast reactions on the part of governments in adapting their mining tax policies. The fiscal analysis software developed for this Master of Engineering and commissioned by the Quebec Ministry of Natural Resources provides the provincial authorities with a quick method of assessing the tax burden of a mining project located in Quebec. It also allows comparison of Quebec's tax burden with that of other Canadian mining provinces as well as the analysis of fiscal changes on a mine's profitability. The use of the software is illustrated by analyzing the effect of inflation and price cycles on the tax burden of a hypothetical mining project located in Quebec. The behavior of specific tax provisions with respect to these factors is emphasized. The report starts with a general review of mineral resource taxation and fiscal instruments available to governments. This is followed by the documentation of mineral taxation in Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia, three important Canadian mining provinces. The general design and programming of tax analysis software is then described and discussed. The thesis concludes with an analysis of two major economic factors that impact on the tax burden of a mining project, inflation and commodity price cycles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".