Integration of UHF profiler information with bistatic measurements
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The McGill/Oklahoma University Bistatic Radar Network provides Doppler velocity measurements from three different points of view. This, in principle, allows a three-dimensional wind field retrieval. Because the receivers are looking at low elevations, the vertical component of the wind is poorly sampled and is mainly obtained by integration of the continuity equation with great associated uncertainty. The retrieval can be improved with measurements taken by a vertically pointing Doppler radar. In this work, we study the impact on the reconstruction of the wind field when UHF wind profiler information is used as an additional constraint along with bistatic measurements. Experiments were done with a synthetic wind field to study how the information from the profiler can be integrated and how it is propagated. These experiments show significant improvement of the retrieved vertical motion. Consequently, the algorithm for the retrieval of the 3-D wind has been modified to combine the UHF information with the bistatic network and its impact is studied for the case of a shallow supercell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it