The association between rhinitis and asthma of occupational origin /
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present thesis explores the relationship between occupational rhinitis and occupational asthma under the postulates of the "united airways disease" concept that refers to the multiple links observed between rhinitis and asthma. Accordingly, the main objective of this thesis is to demonstrate the concomitant expression of significant changes in nasal patency and bronchial calibre following exposure to occupational agents during specific inhalation challenges, complementing the assessment with the investigation of changes in markers of airways inflammation in nasal lavage. To achieve the objectives, we set up a protocol to diagnose occupational rhinitis and conducted a study from January 2005 to January 2007 at Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal in subjects undergoing investigation for occupational asthma. The reliability of the main research tools---acoustic rhinometry and nasal lavage---used to investigate occupational rhinitis was tested by analyzing the reproducibility of the methods. Both methods proved sufficiently reproducible to be included in our investigative protocol. The results presented in this thesis demonstrate a joint reaction of the nose and the lungs in a group of study subjects after performing specific inhalation challenge. This supports the concept of a "united airways disease" and its applicability to rhinitis and asthma of occupational origin. However, the results also show that although occupational rhinitis frequently coexists with occupational asthma it can also be present without occupational asthma. The assessment of upper airways inflammation in a subgroup of study subjects by the nasal lavage method allows us to observe significant changes in eosinophils counts after the challenge that correlates with the decrease in nasal patency observed in the same subjects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".