MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161941590 · doi:10.82308/43874

Purple martin (Progne subis) movement ecology during three stages of the annual cycle

2022· dissertation· en· W7161941590 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kristen Lalla

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverwinteringHabitatForagingNest (protein structural motif)Biological dispersalRange (aeronautics)InsectivoreBreeding pair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avian aerial insectivores are experiencing drastic declines in Canada. While there are likely multiple contributing causes of decline, the main driver or whether there is a main driver is unknown. The purple martin (Progne subis) is North America’s largest swallow, breeding in North America from southern Canada to Mexico and overwintering in South America, primarily in Brazil. The purple martin is a colonial species; it roosts in large numbers and breeds in colonies using mainly artificial nest boxes. My thesis seeks to study important periods in the annual cycle of the purple martin to better understand its decline, especially the disproportionately strong decline in the northeast. Chapter 1 examines foraging behaviour of both breeding and wintering purple martins using GPS biologgers. Foraging range is much larger for overwintering birds compared to breeding birds as breeding birds are constrained by the need to feed their nestlings, and, during both periods of the annual cycle, purple martins select water-based habitats. Chapter 2 studies the breeding success of purple martins in southern Quebec and juvenile dispersal using radio telemetry. Reproductive success in Quebec is comparable to other parts of North America, and departure of fledglings from the colony is predicted by lay date as well as habitat characteristics. Conservation efforts for the purple martin, in addition to current efforts managing nest boxes for the species, should be focused on preserving wetland and open water habitats for this species, especially during the post-fledging period

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAvian ecology and behavior→French-language works237,207→