MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161941823 · doi:10.82308/48131

Characterizing eukaryotic evolutionary environments across the Mesoproterozoic-Neoproterozoic boundary

2018· dissertation· en· W7161941823 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Timothy Gibson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProterozoicSedimentary depositional environmentSupergroupRodiniaStromatoliteOrogenyGeochronologyMolecular clockLaurentia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis implements a combination of sedimentology, stratigraphy, geochemistry, and geochronology to characterize 1200 and 800 Ma eukaryotic evolutionary environments and elucidate the complex interplay between the Proterozoic biosphere, atmosphere, hydrosphere, and lithosphere. The late Mesoproterozoic Bylot Supergroup in the Borden Basin provides a rare window into late Mesoproterozoic biology and geochemistry but lacked reliable depositional ages beyond broad maximum and minimum constraints (1270–720 Ma). New Re-Os radiometric dates from the middle Bylot Supergroup constrain the first known appearance of Bangiomorpha pubescens, the earliest crown group and photosynthetic eukaryote to ca. 1045 Ma. We calibrated molecular clock analyses with this new fossil age in order to estimate the origin of the chloroplast via primary endosymbiosis at ca. 1250 Ma. This date provides a chronological framework for understanding the role of eukaryotic oxygenic photosynthesis in global biogeochemical cycles. Results from this study also indicate that deposition of the Bylot Supergroup coincided with peak collision of the Grenville orogeny and the amalgamation of Rodinia ca. 1090–1020 Ma. Furthermore, comparing the sedimentary records between various depocentres in the Borden Basin highlights asynchronous deposition across the basin and raises the possibility that the upper Bylot Supergroup is younger than previously considered.Radiogenic isotope (Sr, Os, and Nd) chemostratigraphic data from throughout the Bylot Supergroup elucidate complex, multi-phase tectonically-driven paleo-environmental changes in the epicratonic Borden Basin. These results demonstrate that tectonic events throughout the Uluksan Group's depositional history altered the configuration of the basin and drove episodic restriction and marine incursion. Variable marine and freshwater or brackish environments in epeiric seaways, like the Borden Basin, which were relatively widespread in the late Mesoproterozoic Era, may have exerted unique selective pressure on eukaryotic evolution. Marine limestone samples from the Bylot Supergroup provide a new age-calibrated record of the terminal Mesoproterozoic Sr isotopic composition of seawater. These data display a secular trend to more evolved compositions that likely reflects increased chemical weathering of active orogens during the amalgamation of Rodinia. Whereas some geochemical studies suggest atmospheric oxygen increased earlier, most metal proxies indicate late Proterozoic oxygenation commenced ca. 800 Ma along with eukaryotic diversification. A multi-proxy (iron isotopes, iron speciation, and redox-sensitive elements) investigation of transgressive shale intervals from the ca. 811 Ma upper Fifteenmile Group in Yukon reveals the redox structure and highlights the processes that governed the distribution of redox-sensitive metals within the basin. Relative sea-level change in a weakly restricted basin with a redox-stratified water column kick-started vigorous dissimilatory iron reduction and benthic particulate shuttling, which produced large variations in sedimentary redox proxies that do not directly reflect changes in the redox state of the global ocean at this time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→