MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161945616 · doi:10.82308/45563

Voice and identity in contemporary Canadian art: perspectives on vocality and representation

2009· dissertation· en· W7161945616 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSound Studies and Aurality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)TerminologyRepresentation (politics)AsideContext (archaeology)IdeologyField (mathematics)Face (sociological concept)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis argues that voice is defined through both its material and representational status and is fully integrated within the construction of gendered and raced identities, as well as the process of identification itself. At the centre of each chapter is the notion that voice can be an alternate mode of encountering and experiencing the other. As an examination into the issues of contemporary Canadian art, this discussion is initiated from context of art practices but is not limited to this field. Using the works of Janet Cardiff, Geneviève Cadieux, Ken Lum and Rebecca Belmore, this dissertation connects artistic practices to the distinct themes of narrative, embodiment, representation, and place. All of these artists and themes are integral in explaining the connectivity of voice to identity and how this topic is relevant to and reflective of current issues of race and gender within Canadian society. The use of non-visual artistic practices is also evidence of how constructions of identity, when restricted to the visual field are regimented and informed by the ideological structures of the term 'visibility'. 'Visibility' and its metonymic link with overt politicized terminology such as 'visible minority' is a limiting factor in daily existence for many citizens who face discrimination based on regimes of viewing. This dissertation makes a case not only for expanding the critical terms from which to discuss contemporary Canadian art that falls outside of visual parameters, but it is also an examination of existing critical theories of identity. Aside from critiquing aspects of visuality, the following chapters will consider voice as an aspect of the material body and the represented body that is ever present, but rarely considered critically. Through the use of interdisciplinary feminist and postcolonial texts, this thesis constructs a critical framework from which 'voice' can be applied not only to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSound Studies and AuralityFrench-language works237,207