MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161953082 · doi:10.82308/34550

Mass flow and noise measurements in a nanoelectrofluidic device

2025· dissertation· en· W7161953082 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Renee Goodman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)Heat flowThermal radiationMass flowRadiation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les expériences sur le transport de masse à petites échelles éxaminent l’écoulement de gasesà travers des nanopores pour déterminer des paramètres comme la probabilité de transmission, laconductance, et la géométrie. Ces paramètres sont cruciels pour bien comprendre le comportementdes molécules dans ces domaines constraints. À haute pression, une géométrie particuliaire nomméle tuyeaux “de Laval" peut accelérer des gases à des vitesses au-déla de la vitesse du son et générerdes trous noirs sonique, alors qu’à basse pression, le transport des gases dans ces nanopores mêneà plusieurs applications pertinentes pour détecter des particules ultra fines.Dans ce travail, l’écoulement de gas dans un nanopore a été mésuré jusqu’à 42.9 atm. Les ré-sultats on été comparés à une simulation de la dynamique des fluides, démontrant que l’écoulementa compressé et atteint des vitesses de Mach 1 à une pression de 42.3 atm, une étape importante pourla détection de la radiation Unruh et la formation des trous noirs soniques. La température assiciéeavec la radiation Unruh est estimé d’être 0.162 K. De plus, les fluctuations de bruit éléctroniqueont été étudiés dans des environment de gas pour le développement d’une nouvelle méthode dedétection transversale. Plusieurs différentes origines de bruit sont examinés en détail

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport StudiesFrench-language works237,207