MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161956007 · doi:10.82308/22584

Predicting Future Winter Subsurface Drainage Dynamics for Subsurface-Drained Croplands in Cold Climates under Climate

2024· dissertation· en· W7161956007 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ziwei Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrainageWater balanceClimate changeHydrology (agriculture)SnowmeltDrainage basinSoil waterEvapotranspirationSurface runoffSnow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subsurface drainage is a commonly practiced agricultural management practice in North America to improve crop yield by removing excess water from the field. However, previous studies also discovered that the nutrient leached from the subsurface drainage was a leading contributor to the nutrient loss to surface water bodies. Recent in-situ experiments in subsurface-drained croplands in Eastern Canada revealed that winter is critical in determining the region's annual subsurface drainage flow and associated nutrient loss. However, it has been observed that the winter meteorological conditions are continuously changing in Canada. This thesis investigates the impact of warmer winter on winter subsurface drainage dynamics in Eastern Canada's subsurface-drained croplands by using one of the most detailly described process-based bio-physical models, namely the Root Zone Water Quality-Simultaneous Heat and Water (RZ-SHAW) model. Through a multifaceted research approach, the study explores soil freezing dynamics for croplands in Canada under warmer winters, optimizes the RZ-SHAW model simulation time via a custom parallel-distributed computing framework (RS-DPCF), evaluates the model's winter subsurface drainage simulation accuracy, and predicts future winter subsurface drainage dynamics under climate change scenarios.Key findings reveal the nuanced response of soil freezing to warmer winters, highlighting an increase in soil frozen depth with rising temperatures in specific scenarios where the energy gained from reduced snow insulation outweighs the energy gained through increasing air temperature. This dynamic underscore the critical balance between snow cover reduction and soil energy balance alterations due to climate change. The development of the parallel-distributed RS-DPCF significantly improved model efficiency, enabling faster, scalable calibrations and simulations across multiple sites. The RZ-SHAW model was calibrated and validated and was evaluated to deliver satisfactory performance in simulating winter subsurface drainage for two croplands in Eastern Canada. Comparative analyses of the RZ-SHAW model with machine learning models identified the Cubist and SVM-RBF as efficient alternatives for short-term simulations. However, long-term projections underscored the challenge of temporal limited and unbalanced winter subsurface drainage data in capturing winter hydrology’s full complexity for subsurface-drained croplands in cold climates.Future projections indicate a substantial increase in winter subsurface drainage volume and frequency, with a shift towards a more evenly distributed drainage pattern closely aligning with the monthly precipitation pattern. These shifts, driven by the simulated shorter snow coverage, advanced snowmelt timing, and reduced soil freezing periods, suggest February will emerge as a peak drainage month, reversing traditional patterns and highlighting the evolving challenge of managing winter subsurface drainage under climate change.This research contributes to the broader understanding of agricultural hydrology's response to climate change during winter, offering valuable insights for developing adaptive management strategies in cold climate regions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→