Aquatic biodiversity patterns along gradients of multiple stressors and disturbance histories: Integration of paleocology and molecular techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern geological time is commonly referred to as the Anthropocene; a designation recognizing the extent to which humans dominate processes and life on Earth. Within this context, a major theme of biodiversity research is to model and predict species losses due to land exploitation and use. However, in order to more completely understand the effect of human stressors on biodiversity, species losses and gains along with biodiversity change over varied temporal and spatial scales need to be considered in concert. My research seeks to fulfill two main objectives related to both biodiversity trends throughout the Anthropocene and the expansion of paleolimnological techniques for biodiversity science. Firstly, by paying closer attention to the way in which beta diversity can uncover trends previously missed when examining alpha or gamma diversity alone, my work helped improve our understanding of freshwater biodiversity responses to the anthropogenic stressors that have accelerated over the last ~ 150 years. Secondly, by integrating paleolimnological data with data collected from contemporary timescales, and with the application of DNA-based approaches to paleolimnology, I answered questions novel to both paleolimnology and biodiversity science. In my first chapter, I used diatom assemblage data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Lakes Assessment (NLA) program to compare the variation in diatom assemblages across environmental and spatial gradients, using both water-column and surface sediment data. Here I showed that diatom assemblages from both types of sampling were characterized by environmental and spatial gradients in similar ways. In my second chapter, I extended this work with the NLA data, examining modern and historical (pre-1850 CE) timeframes, and showed that beta diversity responded strongly to national-scale land use gradients, with turnover hotspots in regions with low forest cover. My third chapter focused on a specific stressor for aquatic biodiversity, metal contamination in an iron-ore mining region of northern Québec, and showed that the beta diversity of zooplankton communities responded strongly to heavy metal loading. Finally, in my fourth chapter I used metabarcoding approaches to more fully characterize microbial eukaryote communities from sediment cores in this same mining region and showed substantial temporal beta diversity in both diatoms and green algae. This final chapter was the capstone for this work, continuing the integration of paleolimnological data with DNA-based approaches, capturing a more complete representation of aquatic biodiversity than possible with individual proxies. I also demonstrated how beta diversity is an important way to characterize diversity in systems experiencing multiple stressors. In general, this research provides insight into the importance of multi-scale and multi-metric methods in the study of aquatic biodiversity, while illuminating key drivers of aquatic assemblages through time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".