MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161962667 · doi:10.82308/32614

Aquatic biodiversity patterns along gradients of multiple stressors and disturbance histories: Integration of paleocology and molecular techniques

2016· dissertation· en· W7161962667 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amanda Winegardner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiodiversityDiatomPaleolimnologyDisturbance (geology)Beta diversityAnthropoceneAquatic biodiversity researchHabitatEnvironmental changeClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern geological time is commonly referred to as the Anthropocene; a designation recognizing the extent to which humans dominate processes and life on Earth. Within this context, a major theme of biodiversity research is to model and predict species losses due to land exploitation and use. However, in order to more completely understand the effect of human stressors on biodiversity, species losses and gains along with biodiversity change over varied temporal and spatial scales need to be considered in concert. My research seeks to fulfill two main objectives related to both biodiversity trends throughout the Anthropocene and the expansion of paleolimnological techniques for biodiversity science. Firstly, by paying closer attention to the way in which beta diversity can uncover trends previously missed when examining alpha or gamma diversity alone, my work helped improve our understanding of freshwater biodiversity responses to the anthropogenic stressors that have accelerated over the last ~ 150 years. Secondly, by integrating paleolimnological data with data collected from contemporary timescales, and with the application of DNA-based approaches to paleolimnology, I answered questions novel to both paleolimnology and biodiversity science. In my first chapter, I used diatom assemblage data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Lakes Assessment (NLA) program to compare the variation in diatom assemblages across environmental and spatial gradients, using both water-column and surface sediment data. Here I showed that diatom assemblages from both types of sampling were characterized by environmental and spatial gradients in similar ways. In my second chapter, I extended this work with the NLA data, examining modern and historical (pre-1850 CE) timeframes, and showed that beta diversity responded strongly to national-scale land use gradients, with turnover hotspots in regions with low forest cover. My third chapter focused on a specific stressor for aquatic biodiversity, metal contamination in an iron-ore mining region of northern Québec, and showed that the beta diversity of zooplankton communities responded strongly to heavy metal loading. Finally, in my fourth chapter I used metabarcoding approaches to more fully characterize microbial eukaryote communities from sediment cores in this same mining region and showed substantial temporal beta diversity in both diatoms and green algae. This final chapter was the capstone for this work, continuing the integration of paleolimnological data with DNA-based approaches, capturing a more complete representation of aquatic biodiversity than possible with individual proxies. I also demonstrated how beta diversity is an important way to characterize diversity in systems experiencing multiple stressors. In general, this research provides insight into the importance of multi-scale and multi-metric methods in the study of aquatic biodiversity, while illuminating key drivers of aquatic assemblages through time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiatoms and Algae Research→French-language works237,207→