Geomorphic controls on the distribution of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) habitat in two contrasting fifth-order streams in the Gaspe Peninsula, Quebec : the Petite Cascapedia and Bonaventure rivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the watersheds of the Petite Cascapedia and Bonaventure Rivers, Gaspe Peninsula, have broadly similar geology and land use, their segment-scale river geomorphology is contrasted by subtle differences in valley characteristics that are a legacy of their individual geomorphic histories. These differences have consequences on the distribution of Atlantic salmon habitat such as boulder abundance (for parr rearing and overwintering habitats) and spawning substrate quality. Parr preference for boulder-rich river segments (1--5 km) was observed in the Bonaventure River. In the study systems redd distribution was sensitive to relatively small changes in the fines content of riffle substrate. River segments flowing through moderately narrow semi-alluvial valleys present better overall parr habitat (high boulder abundance) and better spawning substrate quality (percentage of sand) than wider valley sections. These differences are due to additional sources of coarse sediment, higher shear stresses, and lower bank erosion rates in such valleys.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".