MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161963819 · doi:10.82308/31547

Discipline and devotion: The hybridization of gymnastics and yoga in Montreal women’s communities

2025· dissertation· en· W7161963819 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Milda Graham

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnographySubculture (biology)Martial artsParticipant observationJapanese culturePhysical educationIdentity (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis investigates the relationship of two currently distinct physical cultures –gymnastics and yoga. According to Mark Singleton they have a history of hybridization. He examined the systemization of modern postural yoga in the 1930s at the Mysore Palace, finding it influenced by international gymnastics texts. I identify gymnastics as both template and foil in yoga’s development. I now ask: is there evidence of this hybridization in Montreal community settings? Gymnastics in North America was a pre-existing base for yoga practice’s transcultural integration, with male teachers from South Asia conveying spiritual authority to local female instructors (Anya Foxen 2020). I support these findings with archival evidence from the Montreal YMCA, identifying the introduction of yoga in 1969 by a pioneering female instructor. I present evidence of postural yoga uptake hybridized in non-yoga classes, and its assimilation into local physical culture removed from its Indic contexts. I then examine a contemporary Montreal women’s gymnastics community by ethnographic methods and analyse it through distinctive yogic paradigms. Interviews elicit yogic values of tapas (discipline), and bhakti (devotion). I position this subculture as a contemporary example of ongoing hybridization; women’s artistic gymnastics with a yogic ethos, built on a foundation of ahimsā (non-harming), inclusive of the self

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0240.019
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiversity and Impact of DanceFrench-language works237,207