MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161965129 · doi:10.82308/11252

Targeted and non-targeted analysis of contaminants from food contact materials by LC-QTOF-MS coupled with QSRR modeling

2025· dissertation· en· W7161965129 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ziyun Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood contact materialsContaminationBisphenol AFood packagingFood safetyFocus (optics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growing concerns about food contact materials (FCMs) due to the migration of harmful substances, including bisphenols, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and various unknown contaminants into food. The conventional method for detecting known food contaminants is "targeted analysis," which relies on predefined information (e.g., exact mass or structural data) to detect and quantify analytes. However, non-intentionally added substances (NIAS), including both unexpected and unknown contaminants, require a novel approach. Non-targeted analysis, notably based on high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) coupled with advanced data mining techniques, has the potential to identify unknown contaminants. The overall objective of this research was to improve the surveillance and safety of food contact materials through the development and application of novel LC-QTOF-MS strategies to analyze known and unknown migrants (NIAS). Chapter 3 of the study involved the analysis of 140 packaging materials from fresh food in North America, with a particular focus on the occurrence and migration of bisphenol A (BPA), bisphenol S (BPS), and other color developers in thermal labels through targeted analysis. While no detectable BPA was found in the samples, significant levels of BPS and other developers were identified. Controlled experiments demonstrated that BPS, along with other developers such as D-8, D-90, and Pergafast-201, could migrate into food. Notably, BPS levels exceeded the European Union's Specific Migration Limit (SML) of 50 ng/g wet weight (ww). In Chapter 4, 246 food thermal labels from 15 countries were analyzed to determine the occurrence of color developers in global markets. BPS, the most frequently detected, was found in 48% of the samples, but other compounds like benzenesulfonamide (NKK-1304) detected at 15%. A controlled migration study showed that PVC films, widely used for plastic wraps, had relatively higher BPS migration (up to 130.7 µg/cm²) compared to polyethylene (PE) films (<0.01 µg/cm²). These results underscore the need to select the proper packaging materials to reduce BPS migration and establish relevant regulations to minimize potential exposure risks. Chapter 5 focused on the occurrence and migration of 18 PFAS in paper-based FCMs. PFAS were detected in a quarter of samples collected in Montreal, primarily in clamshell to-go boxes (100%), popcorn bags (50%), and wrappers (16.7%). PFAS migration into ethanol-based food simulants was influenced by temperature and exposure duration, with increased migration levels under conditions simulating typical food consumption, such as hot meals or microwave heating. The widespread detection of PFAS in clamshell to-go boxes and other FCMs highlights the need for stricter regulations and the development of safer alternatives to reduce PFAS exposure. A large number of unexpected compounds found in food and simulants highlight the importance of developing non-targeted methods for identifying unknown contaminants in FCMs. In Chapter 6, the study developed and validated Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationship (QSRR) models, which predict the retention times of chemical standards across various analytical columns. These models demonstrated great predictive accuracy and effectively help remove false-positives candidates to enhance identification confidence. Overall, this research provides clear evidence of the migration of BPS, alternative color developers, and PFAS from FCMs into food, raising concerns about potential consumer exposure. Findings support the need for ongoing research, reinforced regulatory oversight, and the development of safer packaging materials to protect public health. The use of predictive QSRR models highlights their potential as valuable tools in identifying unexpected contaminants through non-targeted analysis, contributing to broader efforts to enhance food safety and promote environmental sustainability

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals→French-language works237,207→