MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161972400 · doi:10.82308/40302

The contribution of earthworm communities to nitrogen cycling in agroecosystems of Québec /

2007· dissertation· en· W7161972400 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nikita S. Eriksen‐Hamel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarthwormAgroecosystemCyclingMineralization (soil science)Nitrogen cycleSoil waterNutrient cycleSoil biologyLumbricidae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Earthworms have an important role in the decomposition of organic matter, mineralization of nutrients and physical mixing of soils. Despite a large number of laboratory and greenhouse-level studies investigating how earthworms modify soil properties and promote soil fertility, we lack reliable methods to scale-up and quantify earthworm contributions to nutrient cycling at the agroecosystem level. The objective of this thesis is to determine the influence of earthworm communities on nitrogen (N) transformations in soils and to quantify their contribution to nitrogen flux through soils for soybean and maize cropping systems of Quebec. Laboratory growth rates were used to predict how earthworm growth responded to seasonal fluctuations in soil temperature and moisture. The relationships between earthworm populations, soil-N pools and annual crop production were evaluated in a field experiment. When favourable conditions occurred in 2004 (temperatures <20°C, and rainfall at least once a week), a positive relationship was found between earthworm numbers and the plant available-N, including soil mineral-N, microbial biomass-N and total-N removed in soybean grain. In 2005, soil conditions were unfavourable (temperatures > 20°C and little or no rainfall) to earthworm survival and growth, and no relationship was found between earthworm populations, soil N pools and corn production. These data permitted me to make assumptions about earthworm activity and life histories under field conditions, which were used to estimate N flux through earthworm communities with two models. The models were tested for their sensitivity to varying parameter values within the range reported in the scientific literature. During a crop growing period with favourable climate conditions, a large earthworm population (100 g fresh weight biomass m-2 or greater) is predicted to cycle as much as 120 kg N ha-1. Model predictions were very sensitive to input parameters and did not correspond to the partial N budget calculated at the site. Accurate predictions of N mineralization by earthworms require more species- and site-specific parameter values. Further investigation using stable 15N isotopes as tracers would help us to follow the N transformations and evaluate the N flux mediated by earthworms at the field scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyFrench-language works237,207