MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161974854 · doi:10.82308/40851

Studies of mechanisms of OA-pain on a rat osteoarthritis model of the ankle joint

2024· dissertation· en· W7161974854 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Valerie Bourassa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisNeuropathic painNociceptionNociceptorAnkleSpinal cordPathologicalMechanism (biology)Arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteoarthritis (OA), the degenerative and most common form of arthritis, is a complex disease of the whole joint and affects over 3 million Canadian adults. To this day, there is no satisfactory method of relieving osteoarthritic pain and, although chronic pain is the most reported complaint of the disease, our understanding of its driving mechanisms remains limited. Studies in this thesis were devised with the objective of contributing to understanding of the mechanism of pain in OA.Studies investigating changes of innervation of bone have been few and sparse in the literature, mostly due to the complexity and poor success of performing histological labellings on decalcified bone tissue. As a result, there has been a lack of understanding of mechanisms contributing to pain in diseases such as arthritis, osteoporosis, and low back pain. In this thesis, we developed a robust methodology for labelling nerve fibers in bone in various animal models of OA, osteoporosis, and bone fracture.In this thesis, we provide a multi-facetted time-course study of relevant changes in a mono-iodoacetate (MIA) model of OA in the rat ankle joint. We showed a correlation between pain-related behavior and pathological changes, including cartilage and bone degeneration, sprouting of sensory and sympathetic nerves in the bone and synovium, and increased density and activation of glial cells in the dorsal horn. There are many clinical and pre-clinical lines of evidence suggesting a neuropathic component to OA pain, including the occurrence of microgliosis in the spinal cord and modulation of nociceptors by sympathetic afferents. However, putative for a neuropathic pain-like component to OA is the possible contribution of primary afferent damage following joint degeneration. We have shown expression of Activating Transcription Factor 3 (ATF3), a marker of neuronal stress, principally in large-diameter cell bodies that also colocalize with parvalbumin (PV), a marker of proprioceptors. This suggests that Aβ mechanoreceptors innervating the articular joint in OA pain are mostly affected following joint degeneration, which drives interest in understanding the contribution of lamina III-V that receives input from these fibers, in the persistence of OA pain. The internalization of the receptor for substance P, the neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1-r) on lamina I projection neurons of the spinal dorsal horn has been used as a marker of nociceptive responses. Lamina I is an important centre for the modulation and forwarding to the brain of pain-related information. Therefore, changes in the properties of lamina I projection neurons may be important for pain. Previous work from our lab has shown increased expression of NK1-r on lamina I pyramidal neurons in both neuropathic pain and inflammatory arthritis models. In this thesis, we showed similar morphological changes and internalization of the receptor on NK1-r positive neurons, in a rat ankle joint model of osteoarthritis (OA) following movement of the affected joint in lamina I. This work combines many studies of important changes occurring in OA in the peripheral and central nervous systems, identifying various contributing mechanisms to chronic and irreversible pain in the disease, including a neuropathic pain-like component. Such studies have important implications in the development of more suitable therapeutic strategies by identifying potential targets

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPain Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→