MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161977091 · doi:10.82308/13535

Prevalence and determinants of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in Inuit women of Nunavik, Quebec

2008· dissertation· en· W7161977091 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lauren Kay Hamlin-Douglas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman papillomavirusCohortMultivariate analysisLogistic regressionHPV infectionCohort studyEpidemiologyYoung adult

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: To study the prevalence and determinants of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection among Inuit women in Nunavik, Quebec. Methods: We recruited a cohort of Inuit women seeking routine care and living in communities in Nunavik. Baseline demographic and lifestyle data was collected and cervical specimens were tested for HPV-DNA using the PGMY-Line blot assay. Results: Overall and high-risk (HR) HPV prevalence were 28.9% and 20.4%, respectively. Co-infections were observed in 40% of HPV-positive subjects. The most common HPV type was HPV-16; other prevalent HR types included HPV-31, HPV-52, and HPV-58. The most prevalent papillomavirus species were alpha-9 and alpha-3. In multivariate logistic regression, age (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.98) and ten or more lifetime sexual partners (OR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.41-3.60) were associated with HR-HPV infection. Conclusions: HPV prevalence is elevated when compared to most Canadian populations. Age and markers of sexual activity appear to be risk factors for HR-HPV infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCervical Cancer and HPV Research→French-language works237,207→