MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161978612 · doi:10.82308/25223

Writing home in contemporary Canadian long poetry

2025· dissertation· en· W7161978612 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeremy Desjarlais

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryPoeticsNatural (archaeology)Perspective (graphical)Object (grammar)EPICCohesion (chemistry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation examines representations of the home in the long poems of bpNichol, Don McKay, Louise Halfe, and Dionne Brand. The organizing principle of the dissertation is that representing the home is the long poem’s central intention, especially in the long poem’s adjacent concern with expressing the operations of longing. The home, then, is the genre’s primary object, the object for which it longs, producing unique but overlapping declarations in the following areas in this dissertation’s poems: nostalgia (Greek for “the pain of homecoming”), ecology (Greek for “the study of the house”), kîwêtinohk (Cree for “carrying the bundles home”), and unheimlich (German for “the unhomely”). Collectively, these terms function as etymological foundations on which the works of the dissertation combine the form of the long poem with its inherent preoccupation to thematize the home. Chapter 1 addresses bpNichol’s usage of nostalgia in his long poem The Martyrology; by focussing on his paragrammatic saints of language, I argue that figures like St. And, St. Ranglehold, and (no) St. Algia are representations and embodiments of homelessness, which Nichol uses to evaluate the poem’s generic themes of home and pain, especially as his long poem functions as a purposeful revision of the classical epic and its reliance on themes of national cohesion and homecoming. Chapter 2 examines Don McKay’s The Muskwa Assemblage and argues that an ecologically attuned poetics allows McKay to express the concerns and crises of a natural world in peril; by adopting a perspective of collaboration, in which poet and natural world function in unison, the poem represents home in and on its own terms, eschewing the anthropocentric viewpoints and attitudes of hubris that have led to ecological catastrophe. Chapter 3 evaluates the configuration of the cultural and spiritual home of First Nations women in Louise Halfe’s Bear Bones & Feathers and Blue Marrow; home, as understood in this chapter, is the site where the repatriated women, specifically grandmothers and granddaughters, learn to voice their way out of colonial silence and desecration, relying on a communal and choral cohesion of homemaking. Chapter 4 utilizes themes of uncanniness to describe the operations of Dionne Brand’s poem thirsty; domesticity and urbanity are spaces equally disrupted by the uncanny influence of corporeal violence and traumatic mourning, and this chapter examines the way the architectural and emotional sites of home are disturbed through death and the subsequent haunting by the uncanny’s central figure, the ghost. These poets collectively employ the long poem in order to evaluate the polysemic interpretations of home; respectively, Nichol, McKay, Halfe, and Brand interrogate the role of nostalgia interwoven with nationalism and individualism, the natural state of Canada’s biospheres and the ways that poetry can counter ecological catastrophe, the cultural conditions for First Nations people in a colonized home, and the impressions of uncanniness which accompany the contemporary citizen

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0260.014
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureFrench-language works237,207