MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161981605 · doi:10.82308/46969

Eliminating hepatitis C among priority populations: dynamic transmission modeling studies to inform health policy

2022· dissertation· en· W7161981605 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charlotte Laniece

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionSeroprevalenceHepatitis C virusTransmission (telecommunications)Hepatitis CMen who have sex with menSexual transmissionCoinfectionPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) spreads via unsterile injection materials, or, less efficiently, via sexual practices. Of 250,000 people living with HCV in Canada, 21,000 are coinfected with HIV, which exacerbates disease severity. The World Health Organization (WHO) targets for HCV elimination include reductions of incidence by 80% and mortality by 65% from 2015 to 2030. For Canada to meet these targets, a promising approach, known as micro-elimination, is to tailor elimination strategies to priority populations such as people who inject drugs (PWID), men who have sex with men (MSM), and those living with HIV (LWH). Evidence is needed to inform such locally relevant micro-elimination strategies.Objectives: My thesis’ aim was to identify strategies that can achieve and sustain HCV elimination in Montreal’s (Canada) priority groups. I first estimated temporal trends in, and factors associated with, HCV seroprevalence among MSM. Second, I assessed the potential of different interventions to achieve elimination among PWID by 2030. Third, I investigated post-elimination dynamics of HCV transmission among PWID under various scenarios.Methods: To obtain representative estimates of HCV seroprevalence and its associated factors among MSM, I standardised data from 2005 and 2008 surveys of Montreal MSM to 2018 data collected via respondent-driven sampling. The results informed my modelling work, which focused on HCV transmission via injection drug use (IDU). To assess direct and indirect effects of interventions among Montreal PWID, I developed a dynamic model of HIV-HCV coinfection calibrated to 16 years of surveillance data. I simulated increases in HCV testing, treatment, and coverage of opioid agonist therapy (OAT) and needle and syringe programs (NSP) from 2022 to 2030, varying priority groups (PWID LWH/all PWID; active/ex-injectors). I then assessed the sustainability of HCV elimination targets among PWID by modelling post-elimination scenarios (2030-2050) scaling down or suspending different combinations of these interventions.Results: Standardised HCV seroprevalence among MSM remained stable at 8% from 2005 to 2018 and was associated with past IDU and not with sexual behaviours. In my calibrated model, current intervention levels did not achieve elimination among PWID. Increasing testing or OAT and NSP alone made little difference. Reducing time from hepatitis C diagnosis to treatment initiation to 1 year for all PWID led to 95% and 99% reductions in HCV incidence and mortality, respectively, from 2022 to 2030. Post elimination, when scaling down all interventions to current levels, HCV incidence rebounded, doubling from 2 to 4 per 100 PY from 2030 to 2050. High-coverage NSP and OAT were key to either sustain elimination when scaling down testing and treatment or mitigate HCV resurgence when suspending testing and treatment.Discussion: HCV seroprevalence was high and associated with past IDU among Montreal MSM, showing the need to reduce HCV transmission via IDU in Montreal’s priority populations. In a setting with relatively high diagnosis and harm reduction coverage, scaling up treatment is the key to HCV micro-elimination among PWID, and its sustainability relies on access to NSP and OAT. Interventions should reach all PWID, regardless of HIV status or whether people have ceased injecting. Inherent study limitations include challenges in obtaining representative samples of hard-to-reach populations and unaccounted heterogeneity in the modelled population. Strengths include detailed analyses of a wealth of bio-behavioural survey data and the use of a calibrated coinfection model.Conclusions: HCV care and prevention needs overlap between priority populations and reducing transmission via IDU is key in Montreal. For PWID, HCV micro-elimination is contingent on scaling up treatment uptake for all, and high-coverage harm reduction can ensure that elimination efforts are sustained and provide long-term benefits

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHepatitis C virus research→French-language works237,207→