MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161981884 · doi:10.82308/38240

Growing greener cities – The potential for engineered wood construction to lower Montreal’s environmental impact

2023· dissertation· en· W7161981884 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Felicity Meyer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon footprintGreenhouse gasLife-cycle assessmentEnvironmental impact assessmentStock (firearms)Settlement (finance)Economies of agglomerationUrbanizationLand use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep decarbonization of buildings and construction is required to reduce the 40% of global carbon emissions produced by this sector. Mass-timber construction that substitutes carbon-capturing wood for carbon intensive materials like steel and concrete can assist in this transition. However, most studies of material use and embodied carbon in the built environment are deficient in that they rarely analyze the city-scale, and they seldom capture connections between the city and hinterlands that supply most construction materials.As such, we lack knowledge to effectively decarbonize new construction in cities and do not know the potential impacts, such as deforestation, of large-scale mass-timber construction in cities. We address these knowledge gaps through a city-wide assessment of three key construction materials - steel, concrete, and wood - in the city of Montreal, Canada. We combine bottom-up material accounting of the building stock with life cycle assessment to analyze the carbon emissions and land change implications of future development scenarios in the city. We compare the “status quo” construction reliant on concrete and steel to the use of renewable, regionally available materials, such as mass timber at the neighborhood and city scales.This thesis provides much-needed insights to aid the construction sector in strategically implementing low-carbon development that decreases the environmental impacts of urbanization both in cities and in their hinterlands. We find the average embodied carbon impact of modern residential housing on the Montreal Agglomeration to be 2.7 T CO2eq./capita. We estimate that agglomeration wide transition to engineered wood construction and/or increased settlement density does not necessarily decrease this footprint across each individual municipality/arrondisement. We do find that scale up of engineered wood construction could be supported by Quebec’s harvestable forests

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability→French-language works237,207→