Étude de cohorte rétrospective portant sur l'évaluation de l'effet préventif et protecteur associe au Programme Public Scolaire de Sante Dentaire et auprès d'enfants de neuf et 12 ans de trois territoires de CLSC du Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Quebec Preventive Dental Services Public Program (PDSPP) has a recurring annual budget of $ 12 M. Its main component is a school program (PDHPSP) having as major objective to prevent dental caries in primary school children. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the association between exposure to the PDHPSP and dental caries prevalence among Quebec children aged nine and 12 years. The main hypothesis suggested that the nine years old children found at risk for dental caries at age five and who did not benefit from any preventive intervention (the control group) will have an average d3efs + D3EFS greater by three units or more compared to that of children of the same age and caries risk but who received preventive interventions (the intervention group) in the PDHPSP. Method: a retrospective cohort design with cross-sectional data collection was used. A convenience and non-representative sample of 1185 nine years old children and 1191 12 years old was used. […]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".