MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161983897 · doi:10.82308/48760

Determination of cemented rockfill strength with large scale UCS tests under in-situ conditions

2014· dissertation· en· W7161983897 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Isaac Vennes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStopingAggregate (composite)Scale (ratio)Current (fluid)Quality (philosophy)CementMixing (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Birchtree Mine is an underground nickel mine operated by Vale and located near Thompson, Manitoba. The mining method is sub-level stoping with delayed backfill, with cemented rockfill (CRF) employed as backfill. CRF is composed of sized or un-sized aggregate combined with binder slurry. With proper practice and quality control, CRF offers high strength and stiffness, yielding a stable fill exposure and reducing fill dilution. However, the backfill needs to be economically viable. It is therefore important to adjust and optimize the fill recipe to reduce cost while still attaining the fill strength requirement.The primary goal of the study is to test current CRF practice at Birchtree Mine. The secondary goal is to test adjustments to the current backfill practice to reduce backfill cost. The third goal is to set up a permanent laboratory for the mine to conduct further custom tests as part of a quality control program. To achieve this, the experiment itself needs to be evaluated. Suggestions to improve the experiment, as well as recommendations for future testing, are included in this thesis. The general procedure of the study is described as follows. A literature review was conducted to determine the factors affecting CRF strength. A UCS experiment was then designed based on the literature review. A UCS was designed to conduct the UCS experiment for large scale specimens underground. The experiment was conducted, and the test results analyzed. Finally the experiment itself was evaluated.The factors investigated are cement content, CRF mixing quality, water quality, and aggregate particle size distribution. 27 large scale specimens were prepared and cured under field conditions and tested in the underground lab. The effect of added binder, mixing quality, and grading were determined with respect to the current mine practice taking into account the variation of specimen density. Results for the effect of water quality on CRF strength were inconclusive. An important hurdle the program is the manual preparation of uniform specimens in an underground environment. Consequently, a major shortcoming of the experimental procedure is that specimen particle size distribution (PSD) and moisture were monitored instead of controlled, and specimen uniformity was not achieved with respect to PSD and density. Nonetheless, future tests are recommended, and the laboratory is suitable for the conduct of custom tests. The effects of water content, curing time, and slurry mixing, need to be determined to complete the study. In addition, two-way interactions between moisture content, binder content, and fines content, can be evaluated to optimize the fill recipe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTailings Management and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207