MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161988867 · doi:10.82308/28537

Nitrous oxide emissions from variable rate application of nitrogen fertilizer to Panicum virgatum L. in Québec, Canada.

2022· dissertation· en· W7161988867 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexia Bertholon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPanicum virgatumFertilizerNitrous oxideLoamNitrogenPrecision agricultureGreenhouse gasField experiment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitrogen (N) fertilizer is essential to maintain agricultural yields but is susceptible to reactions that produce nitrous oxide (N2O), which acts as a greenhouse gas and contributes to stratospheric ozone depletion. It is difficult to predict where these reactions will produce ‘hot spots’ of high N2O fluxes in a field, as well as the ‘hot moments’ when peak N2O fluxes occur. The objective of this study is to relate the N2O fluxes in a Panicum virgatum L. (switchgrass) field to N fertilizer application rates of 0, 50, 100, and 150 kg N ha-1 while considering the spatial-temporal heterogeneity of the field. In summer 2017, soil samples were collected at 128 locations in an 8.87 ha switchgrass field in the Cookshire-Eaton region (45°20'N, 71°46'W) of Québec, Canada. The sandy loam soil was analysed for standard soil test parameters: macro- and micro-nutrient content, pH and texture. In addition, proximal soil sensing was done to characterize the elevation, electrical conductivity and surface spectral reflectance. This data was used to generate a spatial soil map of the field with R 3.4.1 statistical software and ArcGIS, which revealed three distinct management zones in the field. In spring 2018, four N fertilizer rates were applied to blocks (15 m wide x 100 m long), which created four blocks with variable N fertilizer rates in the high-yielding switchgrass zone and four blocks with variable N fertilizer rates in the low-yielding switchgrass zone. Non-flow-through non-steady-state chambers were installed (n=3 per block) for manual gas sampling and N2O fluxes were calculated during a 1 h period every 7-10 d during the growing season. The experiment was repeated in spring 2019 in the same management zones but in newly-selected blocks that had uniform fertilization in the 2018 growing season. Four N fertilizer rates were applied at random to 4 blocks in the high-yielding zone, plus 4 blocks in the low-yielding zone, and gas sampling chambers (n=3) were placed in new locations in each block. The “hot moments” of N2O flux occurred in the first 30 d after N fertilizer application. Although N2O fluxes differed in the management zones in 2018, there were no distinctive “hot spots” in the switchgrass field in the 2019 growing season. However, the cumulative N2O emission in each growing season tended to increase with greater N fertilizer rates, suggesting that applying more N fertilizer increased the risk of gaseous N loss, probably through denitrification. I conclude that precision agriculture techniques based on geospatial characterization of agricultural fields may help to calibrate site-specific N fertilizer inputs and meet agroenvironmental goals by improving crop production while reducing N2O emissions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics→French-language works237,207→