MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161990294 · doi:10.82308/12574

Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions in subsurface-drained fields in Eastern Canada

2018· dissertation· en· W7161990294 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Qianjing Jiang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrainageTile drainageSoil waterGreenhouse gasWater tableHydrology (agriculture)Water qualitySoil and Water Assessment Tool

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In wet regions subsurface drainage is essential in removing excess water in soil and promoting crop growth; however, it may also result in environmental problems. Implementation of agricultural best management practices (BMPs) on subsurface-drained lands can mitigate environmental problems brought on by human activities and climate change. To provide effective mitigation and adaptation measures for the management of subsurface-drained fields, a quantitative assessment of the impact of water table depth, agronomic management practices, and climate-change-driven rises in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on water quality and crop production were assessed through an modeling approach (Root Zone Water Quality Model, RZWQM2).Drawing on a comprehensive hydrological dataset (i.e., tile drainage, sub-irrigation, soil water content, sap flow and crop growth) for calibration, the RZWQM2 then accurately simulated crop growth and growing season drainage. However, the model significantly overestimated winter tile flow, indicating its reliability to be compromised by its imperfect winter drainage process. Implementation of Kalman filter technique successfully enhanced model reliability and reduced predictive uncertainties in simulating winter drainage in cold areas. The revised modelling approach could then serve to evaluate water and field management scenarios for subsurface-drained and irrigated fields.A comparison of the abilities of the RZWQM2 and DNDC models to comprehensively simulate both crop growth and the biogeochemical processes occurring within the soil profile, showed both models to accurately estimate soil temperature, but DNDC to perform poorly in simulating the soil water content (SWC) due to the lack of a heterogeneous soil profile, shallow simulation depth and lack of root density functions for crops. Both models showed similar performances in simulating N2O emissions, with predicted cumulative N2O emissions being with ±15% of measured vales for all four treatments; however, RZWQM2 better estimated CO2 emissions (greater R2, lesser root mean square error). Both models accurately (within ±15%) estimated cumulative growing season drainage; however, RZWQM2 was more accurate in predicting daily drainage and DNDC was not equipped to simulate controlled drainage or sub-irrigation. Both models performed satisfactorily in predicting grain yields of corn and soybean. Overall, RZWQM2 proved to be more applicable to simulating the biogeochemical processes in sub-surface drained fields than DNDC.RZWQM2 was used to evaluate different potential BMP's ability to mitigate GHG emissions in a subsurface-drained corn (Zea mays L.) field under water table management. The optimal range of N fertilization to reduce GHG emissions while maintaining high nitrogen use efficiency and crop yields was identified as 125 to 175 kg N ha-1. Splitting N applications was found to reduce total N2O emissions by 11%. Controlled drainage with subirrigation resulted in 21% greater N2O emissions, but 6% lower CO2 emissions compared to free drainage. A corn-soybean rotation reduced GHG emissions by 20% over continuous corn. Climate change impacts on crop production, water quality and GHG emissions from subsurface drained fields at two sites of Eastern Canada were assessed using RZWQM2. Under future climate scenarios, mean drain flow and N losses through drainage would increase by 23-41% and 47-76%, respectively. The N2O emissions would rise by 21-25% due to greater denitrification and mineralization, while CO2 emissions would rise by 16% due to greater crop biomass accumulation, faster crop residue decomposition, and greater soil microbial activity. These simulations further indicated that future corn yields would decline, while soybean yields would increase in the future, and that climate change would exacerbate environmental pollution by increasing the GHG emissions from croplands and N losses in drainage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→