Effect of low alcohol consumption during pregnancy on the risk of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the association between high maternal alcohol consumption and adverse reproductive outcomes is well established, the effect of lower levels of consumption during pregnancy is unclear; few studies have investigated this exposure. A hospital-based case-control study of small-for-gestational age (SGA) newborns (birth weight below the 10th percentile, according national standards for gestational age and sex) was conducted in Montreal between 1998 and 2000. Controls were born at the same hospital and during the same period with birth weight at or above the 10th percentile. This analysis aims at investigating the effect of low alcohol consumption (0.25 to 3 alcoholic drinks weekly) during pregnancy on the risk of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth. Independent effects of wine, beer and spirits and of paternal alcohol consumption before conception were also assessed. The logistic regression analysis showed no significant effect of light maternal drinking during pregnancy on the risk of SGA birth. The association was also studied separately for consumption of wine, beer and spirits, and likewise for paternal alcohol consumption, with similarly negative results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".